By BOB HERBERT
Published: March 9, 2009 ,NYT
Working families were in deep trouble long before this megarecession hit. But too many of the public officials who should have been looking out for the middle class and the poor were part of the reckless and shockingly shortsighted alliance of conservatives and corporate leaders that rigged the economy in favor of the rich and ultimately brought it down completely.
...
The American dream was alive and well and seemingly unassailable. But somehow, following the oil shocks, the hyperinflation and other traumas of the 1970s, Americans allowed the right-wingers to get a toehold — and they began the serious work of smothering the dream.
...
The right-wingers were crafty: You smother the dream by crippling the programs that support it, by starving the government of money to pay for them, by funneling the government’s revenues to the rich through tax cuts and other benefits, by looting the government the way gangsters loot legitimate businesses and then pleading poverty when it comes time to fund the services required by the people.
The anti-tax fanatic Grover Norquist summed the matter up nicely when he famously said, “Our goal is to shrink the government to the size where you can drown it in a bathtub.” Only they didn’t shrink the government, they enlarged it and turned its bounty over to the rich.
Now, with the economy in free fall and likely to get worse, Americans — despite their suffering — have an opportunity to reshape the society, and then to move it in a fairer, smarter and ultimately more productive direction. That is the only way to revive the dream, but it will take a long time and require great courage and sacrifice.
The right-wingers do not want that to happen, which is why they are rooting so hard for President Obama’s initiatives to fail. They like the direction that the country took over the past 30 years. They’d love to do it all again.
---Joy, Passion, Pride and Love
---Stand on the Giants
---Make the World Beautiful
Yundong Tu's Webpage
Monday, March 9, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(172)
-
▼
March
(48)
- How will the April Fools' computer worm affect you?
- Do you know this about Tenure?
- Popularity of Economics (3)
- Ease high unemployment rate in China
- If You're So Smart, Why Aren't You Rich?
- Albert Rees in the eyes of Ashenfelter and Pencavel
- Passion from the White House
- Economic joy with the Young
- Lost in words
- Feel Better About Yourself
- Tips for feeling better about yourself
- Calls for a model
- who will users blame?
- “Is the new bull market starting?”
- A nascent sign of recovery
- Popularity of Economics (2)
- Teaching economics during rough times
- Popularity of Economics
- Unemployment rate as high as 11 per cent in Michigan
- Data Envelopment Analysis
- Second thoughts on bootstrap
- Ranking of Economics Departments
- Black Friday on 13th?
- Economists disagree, but who is more confident reg...
- Nonparametrics becomes the focus
- Losing A Job May Help You Find Yourself
- Mathematical Model and the Mortgage Mess
- They Tried to Outsmart Wall Street
- Reviving the Dream
- A Rising Dollar Lifts the U.S. but Adds to the Cri...
- Lessons from the Great Depression for Economic Rec...
- Half-Space
- Soaking the Rich?
- Blogger Responds to Economic Crisis?
- Amazing people at Berkeley---MICHAEL JANSSON
- What Rain Man is
- Serial Correlation and Serial Dependence
- Overview of Statistical Estimation Theory
- Specification testing
- A letter to mum
- Weak Exogeneity
- Are regression models useful?
- Broken in two
- From Limbless to Limitless
- Efficient Local Polynomial Estimation of Nonparame...
- Shopper City
- How to be a great conference participant?
- The spirit of perfection
-
▼
March
(48)
No comments:
Post a Comment